Sand
in reality is nothing else than very small stones.
Axel
F. Cronstedt
In the world of geological terminology, sand refers
to unconsolidated sediments with particle sizes ranging from 1/16 mm (sugar
grain size) to 2 mm (BB size). Sand particles are visible to the naked
eye with silt being smaller (cannot observe grains without magnification; grits
in your teeth with tasting) and clay the smallest particles. Pebbles, or
gravel, are larger than sand grains. Sand is composed of rock and mineral
fragments derived from previously existing rocks, and then deposited by forces
such as wind, streams, gravity, waves, tides and currents. Here in
Colorado we are most familiar with sand composed of either quartz or feldspar
fragments---eroded from the igneous and metamorphic rocks that core the
mountain ranges.. However, in visiting Florida one would find sand with
high percentages of fossil fragments or limestone. On the island of
Hawai’i is Papakolea Beach, a “green sand” beach where the sand particles are
pieces of olivine eroded from nearby volcanic basalt. At White Sands
National Monument in New Mexico the sands are particles of white gypsum.
Sandstone then refers to consolidated (hardened)
sand, with siltstone (massive), shale (fissile) and claystone being the
consolidated rocks of clay and silt. Conglomerate (rounded particles) and
breccia (angular particles) are rocks with pebble and larger size components.
The consolidation of particles takes place by either compaction or cementation
with the latter common in sandstone and conglomerate. The cement
precipitates in the pore spaces between the sand grains and commonly is either
calcium carbonate (CaCo3), silica (SiO2), or iron oxide
(Fe2O3). The nature of the cement also plays a role
in the color of the sandstone. For example, a small percentage of iron
oxide in the cement will impart a bright red or orange color to the sandstone.
However, in many cases not all pore spaces are completely filled with cement
and buried sandstone may serve as a water aquifer, or be saturated with
petroleum.
A QFL Composition Diagram
used to plot minerals and identify sandstones. From a lecture by Earle McBride.
Field geologists often use adjectives or qualifiers
to describe different sandstones such as feldspathic sandstone (or arkose) for
sandstones with a high percentage of the various feldspars, quartz arenites
(arenite=sandstone) with a high percentage of quartz, etc. After
returning to the laboratory the geologist might make “thin sections” so that
individual grains may be counted under a petrographic microscope. Samples
may then be plotted on a Q(quartz), F(feldspar), L(lithic=rock)
diagram for a more precise identification. This thin section work,
and subsequent plotting, then informs the geologist about such things as
textural maturity and composition, which in turn is used to help interpret the
depositional environment of the original sand. For example, sandstone
plotting in the far left margin, lower quadrant of the triangle (arkose) would
indicate erosion of a feldspar-rich source rock without a long distance of
transport. Locally, many of the sandstones in the Fountain Formation (in
Colorado Springs think Garden of the Gods and Red Rock Canyon Open Space) are
feldspathic sandstones derived from the nearby feldspar-rich Pikes Peak
granite. The angularity of the individual particles indicates a short
distance of transport.
Greywacke (informally called dirty sandstone) has a
particular type of matrix (clay particles between the rock grains and cement)
plotting toward the lower right corner of the triangle. This is
significant since one would not normally expect clay particles (fine) and
rock/mineral fragments (sand) to be deposited together. However, modern
oceanic studies have shown that submarine avalanches and turbidity currents are
able to churn up the sediments on the edges of the Continental Shelf (sloping
down to the trenches) and deposit these mixed size particles. This
understanding then allows geologists to more accurately place continents in constructing
paleogeographic maps (maps detailing positions of continents and oceans in the
geologic past). The greywackes that I am familiar with include the great
Franciscan Group of the Coast Ranges in California, several in the Precambrian
of the Canadian Shield (around the U. S. Great Lakes), and rocks comprising the
core mountains of New Zealand. There are smaller exposures of greywacke
in some of the Precambrian rocks of Colorado; however, they are not
common. A reasonable explanation might be that what we now know as
Colorado has been part of the more stable continental interior (termed the
craton) since the end of the Precambrian (last ~550 m.y.). The migration
of marine waters on and off the craton was in a shallow water environment
without a continental slope, continental shelf or deep oceanic
basin.
The sandstones plotting out in the extreme upper
part of the triangle are termed quartz arenites since quartz is the dominant
(over 90 %) mineral. Some of these sandstones are quite monomineralic
with nearly 100% quartz. Perhaps the most famous of these quartz arenites
is the St. Peter Sandstone (Ordovician age) of the Midwest and Central Plains
(also known as the Simpson Sandstone in Oklahoma and informally as the Ottawa
sand). The pureness of this sand (~99.5% quartz) has spawned a large
glass making industry. In Colorado, a similar formation is termed the
Harding Sandstone from a locality near Canyon City. The Harding perhaps
is best known for producing some of the oldest vertebrate fossils in the world
(as well as building stone for the local houses of incarceration).
Locally, some of the sandstones found in the Lyons Sandstone (at
Garden of the Gods) are quite pure quartz arenites. In reality, most of
the sandstones found in Colorado (other than the arkosic Fountain Formation and
its correlatives) plot somewhere in the upper 1/3 of the triangle---the mineral
constituents are mostly quartz but other mineral/rock fragments are
present. The reason behind this fact is: 1) quartz is one of the most
abundant minerals in metamorphic and igneous rocks, often the source for sandstones;
2) a high hardness [~7 Mohs] and a lack of cleavage make the mineral quite
durable; and 3) quartz is chemically stable and has a very low solubility in
water. Sandstones are fairly resistant to erosion and therefore
often form hogbacks, fins, buttes, cliffs, flatirons and “caprock”.
Resistant sandstone (Elephant Toe Butte) at Dinosaur
National Monument.
|
Now on to the quartzites, and I do mean plural as
this term is used, perhaps to confuse people, as describing both
sedimentary rocks and metamorphic rocks! Some of the quartz arenites,
those rocks composed essentially of quartz grains, become so tightly cemented
that the rock takes on a glassy appearance and is quite hard. In fact,
geologists term these sedimentary quartzites as orthoquartzites.
Concretions weathering from the Dakota Formation at
Rock City in central Kansas (a few miles from the author’s home town).
The rock is an orthoquartzite with an excess of 95% quartz grains; however,
the cement is calcite (rather than silica). From McBride and Milliken,
2006.
|
In Colorado, some sandstones of the Cambrian Sawatch
Formation are called quartzite as the quartz grains are tightly cemented by
silica. In fact, one can find references in the geological literature to
the Sawatch Quartzite (as opposed to Formation) as the name of the rock
unit. In central Kansas a resistant and hard unit of the Dakota Formation
is cemented by calcite and locals call it the Lincoln quartzite and market the
stone as road aggregate or “rip-rap” for stabilization of steep areas such as
dam faces on reservoirs. The best exposures of this orthoquartzite are about 30 miles from Lincoln at Rock City.
One of the best known quartzites in the central part of the US is the Sioux Quartzite of Proterozoic (Precambrian) age that crops out in far eastern South Dakota and adjacent Minnesota. The formation is mostly a tightly cemented, pink to red quartz arenite (orthoquartzite) that has been subjected, in places, to a very mild metamorphism---but not enough heat and/or pressure to term it a true metamorphic quartzite. The outcrops are not all that common as most of the time they are covered in glacial drift. However, the numerous quarries have produced millions of tons of this resistant rock for building stones and large rip-rap. It seems as if tens/hundreds of miles of the Missouri River in South Dakota have seen its banks stabilized by large-scale hunks of that distinctive pink to red quartzite. Many of these “hunks” (2 x 3 feet or so) contain well-formed sedimentary structures such as ripple marks and or cross bedding.
One of the best known quartzites in the central part of the US is the Sioux Quartzite of Proterozoic (Precambrian) age that crops out in far eastern South Dakota and adjacent Minnesota. The formation is mostly a tightly cemented, pink to red quartz arenite (orthoquartzite) that has been subjected, in places, to a very mild metamorphism---but not enough heat and/or pressure to term it a true metamorphic quartzite. The outcrops are not all that common as most of the time they are covered in glacial drift. However, the numerous quarries have produced millions of tons of this resistant rock for building stones and large rip-rap. It seems as if tens/hundreds of miles of the Missouri River in South Dakota have seen its banks stabilized by large-scale hunks of that distinctive pink to red quartzite. Many of these “hunks” (2 x 3 feet or so) contain well-formed sedimentary structures such as ripple marks and or cross bedding.
Sioux Quartzite with a source area in eastern South Dakota
appearing as a glacial erratic in northeastern Kansas. This
orthoquartzite is extremely hard and resistant to erosion. Photo
courtesy of Kansas Geological Survey.
|
So, the Sioux Quartzite is sort of a hybrid
consisting mostly of tightly cemented (quartz cement) quartz grains
(orthoquartzite) but also containing areas where there has been some low
cooking that has produced a few metamorphic minerals such as sericite and
pyrophyllite, and fused a few individual grains together.
Metaquartzites are the true quartzites and are
metamorphic rocks, formed when quartz arenites are subjected to high heat and
high pressure in areas of regional metamorphism. This metamorphism
generally takes place along plate margins where some sort of plate collision or
subduction is occurring. In Colorado these metaquartzites are almost
always Precambrian in age.
So, confusion may abound, and sometimes
identification of a hard rock, with a glassy texture, and “sugary grains, is
difficult! However, the following hints will make life easier. If
you suspect the cement is either calcite or silica (clear), a drop of
hydrochloric (or similar such as acetic) acid will determine composition.
You should also examine any reaction with a hand lens to make certain the
cement is “fizzing” rather than some included calcite grains. If calcite
cement is present then the rock is a quartz arenite or orthoquartzite as any
calcite cement in the original rock would have been destroyed with later
metamorphism. Examine a fresh surface of the rock with a hand lens and
observe the individual grains. In a sedimentary quartzite one can
observe: 1) the cement; 2) the rounded grains of quartz (usually not fractured
and simply touching each other); and 3) the fact that usually the rock breaks
between the grains. In a metamorphic quartzite: 1) the grains are
commonly fractured, “squashed and squeezed” , and recrystallized during
metamorphism; 2) the cement is recrystallized and “blends in” with grains to
give the rock a quite glassy appearance; and 3) the rock breaks through the
grains.
Cartoon of an orthoquartzite thin section.
Rounded quartz grains are cemented by such agents as silica, calcite, or iron
oxide. Note any break is between and around the grains. Public Domain sketch.
|
Cartoon of a metaquartzite thin section. Note compressed and fractured Quartz grains
and the break is through the grains. The
space between the grains is recrystallized quartz. Public Domain sketch.
I see pieces of sandstone virtually every day of my
life but rarely give them a second thought. However, trained geologists
can determine a wealth of information from what appears as a simple
“stone.” Universities teach entire courses on the identification and
classification of sandstones (I know from past experience). I read
somewhere that several hundred classification schemes have been proposed for
sandstone---that appears to be overkill! I also read about collectors
specializing in acquiring vials/jars of unconsolidated sand from localities
around the world. Next time that you visit a beach or a river collect a
small bottle of sand and take it home and examine particles under a
scope. I think that you will be surprised with the complexity of the
different grains.
REFERENCES
CITED
McBride, E. F. and Milliken, K. L. 2006. Giant
calcite-cemented concretions, Dakota Formation, central Kansas, USA.
Sedimentology, v.53, p. 1161-1179.