Most
rockhounds are familiar with the element barium although they have never seen
the element in its natural state—it is never found in nature as a free
element. We know the element due to its
combination with the sulfate ion, SO4, to produce the mineral barite
or baryte—BaSO4, or to the lesser known barium carbonate, BaCO3,
the mineral witherite. Other than those two minerals many of us would be hard
pressed to talk about other minerals containing barium as it is mostly an
accessory element, or minerals with barium as the major cation are rare.
I
certainly knew very little about barium minerals until I found an article by
Dunning and others (2018) describing the distribution of barium silicate
minerals from Baja California, Mexico, north to Alaska. It is a comprehensive, three-part series and
may be found at: www.baymin.org/papers.
Barium
silicates are rare minerals and many of the described sites only contain one or
two different species, yet these total sites contain 44 different
minerals. Even today there are new
barium silicate minerals being discovered and described. About the only minerals on the list that I recognize
are joaquinite-Ce [NaBa2Ce2FeTi2Si8O26(OH)-H2O]
and benitoite [BaTiS3O9] collected from the famous Dallas
Gem Mine in the San Benito Mountains of California. The blue gem benitoite is the State Gem of
California. Both minerals form in
fracture fillings correlated with subduction zone rocks (serpentinite,
greenstone, blueschist) associated with converging plate boundaries, mostly at
high pressures and low temperatures.
After
the Dallas Gem Mine the best-known locality for barium silicates is Big
Creek-Rush Creek Mining District in Fresno, County. I could not locate much
information about the mining history other than the mines produced barium. To rockhounds, the interesting aspects of the
District are the mines that have produced the type locality of 16 rare barium
silicates plus they are the home of at least 13 other rare barium
silicates. By my count that is 29
different rare barium silicate minerals at this single locality. In examining
mineral photos from Big Creek-Rush Creek on MinDat it is interesting to note
that many of these barium silicates only have three to four photos displayed on
the web site. Although the number of
photos on MinDat is not a solid indicator of mineral abundance, it certainly
gives the reader a decent indicator of rarity to abundance.
From
a Denver Show many years ago I picked up a perky box with a specimen containing
the barium silicates macdonaldite and sanbornite collected from the Big
Creek-Rush Creek District in California. I purchased it since the District is
the Type Locality of macdonaldite (the wonders of cell phones to examine MinDat
when looking at minerals). It certainly
was worth the two bucks I paid, and there are probably additional barium
silicates in the specimen.
Macdonaldite
is a barium calcium hydrated silicate [BaCa4Si16O36(OH)2-10H2O]
that has a silky luster (may appear at times to be vitreous). It is soft at
~3,5-4.0 (Mohs), usually white to perhaps colorless, and is transparent to
translucent. MacDonaldite usually
appears as acicular crystals or fibers arranged as a white radial group. At Big Creek-Rush Creek macdonaldite appears
as veins and fracture coatings in a sanbornite and quartz bearing metamorphic
rock, the result of contact metamorphism of sedimentary rocks by a Late
Cretaceous granodiorite pluton (Dunning and others, 2018). Macdonaldite is a low temperature and late appearing mineral and may, in most cases, be an alteration product of sanbornite (Dunning and others, 2018).
|
A large radial group of macdonaldite crystals and fibers located on sanbornite. Width FOV ~9 mm. |
|
A small group of macdonaldite acicular crystals (M) less than 1mm in width. Numerous other minerals, perhaps barium silicates. |
|
I presume the brown to brown-yellow mineral surrounding macdonaldite (M) (~1 mm) is a barium silicate (maybe even two or more). Perhaps it is verplanckite? |
|
Could the orange be muirite? |
Sanbornite,
a barium silicate [Ba2(Si4O10], is colorless
to white or perhaps pale green, but forms platy sheets with good cleavage. The sheets are often iridescent and have a
vitreous to pearly sheen. It is
transparent to translucent with a hardness of 5.0 (Mohs). Sanbornite occurs in
veins of metamorphic quartzites (previously sandstone) and hornfels (previously
shale/siltstone; low pressure; moderate to low temperature ~400-600 C) (Dunning and others, 2018) heated by igneous
plutons, and almost always occurs with quartz.
|
A stack of horizontal sanbornite sheets with the arrow parallel to the sheets. The white coating is probably macdonaldite. Width FOV ~1.4 cm. |
|
Looking at the top layer of the stack shown above. Note pearly to vitreous luster and the iridescence. Width FOV ~1.4 cm. |
I
have been trying to compare the barium silicates with the calc-silicates;
however, that may be above my pay grade. The calc-silicates [Ca5(SiO4)2(CO3)]
usually form in high-temperature, contact metamorphic zones where a granitic-dioritic
magma (high magnesium, silicon, aluminum, and iron content) intrudes into cooler
(lower temperature) limestone or other carbonate rocks. The invasive hydrothermal fluids alter the limestone
into other minerals such as iron oxides, calc-silicates (wollastonite, diopside),
andradite and grossularite garnets, epidote and perhaps ore minerals. These
altered carbonate deposits are termed skarns.
The
barium silicates also form in low to high temperature, low pressure contact
metamorphic zones. My
question involves the original source of the barium—where did it originate? I did find out from Dunning and others (2018)
that mixtures of BaCO3 plus SiO2 yielded BaSi2O5
plus CO2 according to the equation: BaCO3+ 2SiO2→
BaSi2O5+ CO2↑. This equation shows witherite
and silica produced sanbornite plus CO2 vapor at a temperature range
from 440 C to 600 C. Other stoichiometric
mixtures of silica + baryte failed to react at temperatures up to 750 C.
Virtually no baryte broke down at these temperatures. These results would
appear to eliminate baryte as a direct source of the barium for the formation
of sanbornite during metamorphism. The reaction of
barium carbonate and silica to form sanbornite and carbon dioxide is analogous
to the well-known reaction of calcite and silica forming wollastonite and
carbon dioxide. So, does the formation of all barium silicates require the
presence of barium carbonate?
If I understand Dunning and others (2018), the presence of barium carbonate was required for the formation of most barium silicates although a few minerals are the result of secondary alteration of sanbornite or gillespite.
1.
Sedimentary
baryte, or witherite, precipitated locally as part of an abyssal sedimentary
sequence in a possibly continuous narrow basin off the west coast of Mexico and
California within the late Paleozoic to Early Jurassic time period.
2.
Diagenetic
activity then dissolved the baryte and re-precipitated the barium as witherite.
3.
Burial
of the sediments to depths was followed by one or more periods of severe
deformation, probably caused by subduction along a continental margin and
thermal metamorphism attributable to the intrusion of large granitic plutons.
The temperature of metamorphism was between 400 C and 600 C.
4.
Metamorphic
action on residual sediments rich in barium (the witherite) and other elements
is the major reason for the majority of barium silicate occurrences.
5.
The
majority of barium silicates identified in this study are of primary origin.
6.
The
secondary alteration of sanbornite during low temperature hydrothermal activity
has produced macdonaldite.
In my case, this is one of life’s persistent questions that has been ferreted out by locating the tremendous article by Dunning and other (2018).
REFERENCES CITED
G.E.
Dunning, R.E. Walstrom, and W. Lechner, 2018, Barium Silicate Mineralogy of the Western Margin, North
American Continent, Part 1: Geology, Origin, Paragenesis and Mineral
Distribution from Baja California Norte, Mexico, Western Canada and Alaska, USA:
Baymin Journal, Vol 19, No. 5.