Saturday, March 4, 2017

AUGELITE: AN UNCOMMON GREEN PHOSPHATE


The trouble with doing nothing is that you never know when you are finished.


Ah, another fairly rare phosphate mineral has popped up on my radar screen.  The other day, in a fit of doing nothing of importance, I spotted a photo of a sparkling faceted gemstone called augelite.  Somewhere from the back recesses of my mind a bell started ringing and forced my memory to “get in gear.”  Yep, now I remember that at a Tucson show I picked up a specimen of augelite from a Peruvian dealer: 1) it was a “pretty” specimen; 2) it was a phosphate mineral; 3) it was not in my mineral vocabulary; 4) it was reasonably priced; and 5) the dealer was a pleasant person.  Upon returning home I stuck the specimen in the drawer labeled South America #1 and promptly moved on to other “things.”  OK, my mind works in mysterious ways so I recently hauled out the specimen and again thought it was nice and decided to widen my mineral vocabulary!
 
A pale green crystal of augelite (A) attached to several gemmy quartz crystals (Q).  The C-axis runs the length of the crystal.  See below. Maximum length of crystal is ~1 cm.
A computer-generated crystal of augelite.  Compare with photo above.  Note C axis runs length of crystal.  Image courtesy of  www.smorf.nl.  Original drawing in V.M. Goldschmidt, Atlas der Krystallformen, 1913-1923.
Augelite is an uncommon hydroxyl aluminum phosphate [Al2PO4(OH)3] that has been reported from several localities around the world but specimens on the market seem to come from just a few localities in in Bolivia, Peru, Canada (Dawson Mining District), and California (the now depleted Champion Mine).  In fact, most market specimens are from the "world’s best occurrence" at Mundo Nuevo Mina, Huamachuco, Sanchez Carrion Province, La Libertad Department, Peru (Moore, 1915).  The crystals from Mundo Neuvo are usually apple-green to colorless, transparent to semi-transparent, have vitreous to pearly luster, and are well developed. Crystals are commonly striated, have a white streak and are ~4.5 hardness (Mohs). Other localities have yielded colorless to white to pale yellow and even pale blue crystals. Most of the Peruvian specimens are intimately associated with quartz crystals and “needle quartz” is especially attractive.  Crystals are Monoclinic and commonly appear as thick tabs.

Augelite crystal shown above.  Note tiny terminated quartz crystal extruding from crystal face at end of arrow.  Length of quartz crystal is less than 1 mm.

“Augelite forms in a variety of situations including high-temperature Al-rich hydrothermal deposits, tin- and/or lithium-bearing pegmatites, hydrothermally altered andesites, Al-rich metaquartzites” (Visser and others (1997), “hydrogen metamorphism of phosphate-bearing rocks in peraluminous sediments” (AZO Mining, 2017) and by “metasomatic replacement of aluminosilicates minerals” (Wise, 1975).  I remain (after several hours of searching) uncertain about the geology of the Mundo Neuvo Mine.  At one time it produced hubnerite and scheelite so perhaps the initial target was tungsten?  According to Moore (2015), Mundo Neuvo was last used as a specimen mine (especially for augelite).

I noticed that augelite has been found in the Black Hills of South Dakota from the Rough and Ready Mine (Tinton District), and the Bob Ingersoll, Etta and Hugo mines in the Keystone District.  All localities are lithium-rich pegmatites so perhaps augelite formed from the alteration of primary lithium minerals?  At the famous Palermo #2 Pegmatite in New Hampshire, augelite forms as a high temperature (~500-300C), oxidizing to non-oxidizing, alteration product of montebrasite [LiAlPO4(OH)], and in oxidizing to non-oxidizing, low temperature (~300-100 C) conditions (Nizamoff, 2006).  See previous posting on alteration of lithium-rich minerals.

So, augelite is another of those uncommon phosphate minerals that has entered my specimen vocabulary.  I look forward to a continued learning experience about rather exotic, at least in my collection, minerals.   


REFERENCES CITED
AZO Mining, 2017, Augelite-occurrence, properties and distribution: www.azomining.com.

Moore, T.P., 2015, What’s new in the Mineral World: The Mineralogical Record, Report #40.

Nizamoff, James, 2006, The Mineralogy, geochemistry and phosphate paragenesis of the Palermo #2 Pegmatite, North Groton, New Hampshire: University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations, Paper 398.
Visser, D., R.O. Felius, and M. Moree, 1997, Augelite and cerian crandallite in dumortierite quartzites, Vaca Morta quarry, Vereda Range, Macaubas, Bahia, Brazil: Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 61, issue 4.

Wise, W.S., 1975, Solid solution between the alunite, woodhouseite, and crandallite mineral series: Neues Jahrbuch fiir Mineralogie Monatshefte.

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

PURPURITE (PHOSPHATE) FROM SOUTH DAKOTA AND COLORADO



For my part, I travel not to go anywhere, but to go. I travel for travel’s sake. The great affair is to move.
          Robert Louis Stevenson

This past summer I had an opportunity to revisit the Helen Beryl Mine in Custer County, South Dakota in the Black Hills.  I had first explored the area in the spring of 1966 as a geology graduate student enrolled in the University of South Dakota.  I, and a few of my geology friends, initiated a road trip to prospect for minerals in the Hills.  Our intention was to collect specimens for our introductory geology labs with the “leftovers” made into kits for sale to other interested students. 

If I remember correctly, we really did not sell any specimen kits back on campus.  But I do remember locating places and “things” in the Hills that I had never seen before.  We explored caves and mines and roadcuts and roadhouses with beer and country music and even had time to pound and collect minerals.  Growing up in Kansas I had never seen beryl before let alone spodumene.  The trip opened my eyes to the wonders of the Hills and was the highlight of the semester!

In revisiting the Helen Beryl Mine, I only had an opportunity to sort through part of the dump piles since I was hobbling around on my cane awaiting another knee surgery upon returning to Colorado Springs.  I did not find much of real interest but did bring home small specimens of purpurite and alluaudite, both phosphate minerals.

Purpurite [Mn+++PO4] is an interesting mineral that is the oxidation product of a lithium-rich mineral called lithiophilite [LiMn++PO4] and/or triphylite [LiFe++PO4].  There is a little confusion here and some of these minerals are difficult to distinguish between.  For example, purpurite is the manganese-dominant phosphate and is in solid solution with the iron-dominant phosphate called heterosite [Fe+++PO4]; both are similar appearing to each other.  The parent of heterosite is triphylite with the latter in solid solution with lithiophylite.  So, nature has provided us with lithium-iron-manganese phosphates that weather to purple- to reddish purple- to rose- colored purpurite or heterosite.  During the weathering process, the lithium leaches away.  Can I tell the difference between purpurite and heterosite?  Maybe, but probably not.  My identification is based up two things: 1) the more purple to purple- red colored specimens are probably manganese-dominant purpurite since an increase in iron darkens the color; and 2) the locality mineral list published by MinDat!  
Purpurite (P) from the Helen Beryl Mine. A? may be alluaudite.  Specimen maximum width ~2.6 cm.
Purpurite seems never to form crystals but is always massive to granular.  Mineralogists with much more knowledge than me have placed the mineral in the Orthorhombic Crystal System.  I have described the color, and the hardness is about 4.5 (Mohs).  It has a dull or earthy luster and I obtained a red streak.  Once observed, purpurite/heterosite is easy to spot as it appears as a purple or purple-red “stain” on the matrix.

For purpurite/heterosite to form, a lithium(s) mineral must be present in the parent rock (precursor), usually igneous in nature.  As I understand the situation, lithium-rich minerals are not all that common in the rock record with the most abundant being “the lithium aluminosilicates spodumene,  petalite, and eucryptite , the phosphates amblygonite-montebrasite and lithiophilite-triphylite, several species of mica (mostly known as lepidolite), and the tourmalines (elbaiterossmaniteliddicoatite)” (London, 2017).   It also seems these lithium-rich minerals are most abundant in pegmatites. My next question then was—what was the original source of the lithium? 

London (2017), in a fantastic article in Rocks and Minerals, explained the situation quite clearly: sediments containing fine-grained micas and clays that are lithium-rich collect in ocean basins and form a mud drape over the oceanic basaltic crust.  This mud lithifies into shale that later, during mountain building events, becomes a metamorphic mica schist.  During even later events the lithium in the mica was incorporated into molten granitic magma that upon slow cooling becomes pegmatites with lithium-rich minerals.   The formation of lithium-rich pegmatites is much more complex than this skeletal summary and I would suggest interested readers examine Professor London’s article.  
   
The Black Hills of South Dakota have numerous pegmatites containing many lithium-rich minerals.  For example, some of the largest spodumene crystals in the world have been identified in pegmatites of the Etta Mine near Keystone. 

The Helen Beryl Mine, southwest of Custer, is an oval mass of pegmatite about 250 feet long and 130 feet wide (Lufkin and others, 2009).  MinDat.org indicates the presence of lithium precursors spodumene, lithiophylite-triphylite and montebrasite-amblygonite (need chemical analysis to distinguish). London (2017), noted that “an abundance of amblygonite-montebrasite or lithiophilite-triphylite is indicative of the high phosphorus content of the marine shales from which most Li-rich pegmatites are derived.”  As the name implies, the Helen Beryl location was mined primarily for beryl.

The phosphate mineral alluaudite 
[(Na,Ca)(Mn,Mg,Fe++)(Fe+++,Mn++)2(PO4)3] also occurs at the Helen Beryl Mine.  This uncommon phosphate has a range of colors from green to yellow to tan to brownish yellow but is usually observed as a dirty yellow, opaque, earthy mass of tiny fibers and/or nodules---pretty nondescript; however, I have seem samples that are a dark greenish-black.  MinDat.org noted alluaudite is an alteration product of the complex phosphates varulite and arrojadite (see Blog posting April 2, 2013).
Photomicrograph of tan alluaudite from a second small specimen from the Helen Beryl Mine.  Length of tan spot ~2 mm.  The black matrix could also be alluaudite or some sort of phosphate.
My next question revolved around the “cause” for oxidation of divalent (++ charge) iron and manganese to the trivalent (+++ charge) forms.  At least in some cases the oxidation is due to bacteria.  However, I doubt that is the case in South Dakota pegmatites.  One of life’s persistent questions waiting for an answer!  

But, hold on, and paraphrasing the NPR show Wait, Wait Don’t Tell Me, London (2017) again provided an answer.  It seems as lithium-rich minerals in pegmatites decompose rather rapidly!  Toward the end of pegmatite formation, and in the presence of hot aqueous solutions, the early formed lithium-rich minerals undergo alteration: “spodumene and petalite alter to eucryptite + albite and to mica + albite. Montebrasite is commonly replaced by intergrowths of apatite + mica… Lithiophilite-triphylite alter to a large array of hydrous and more oxidized species of phosphates.”  In addition, the oxidation of lithium-rich minerals continues with surface weathering. At the Helen Beryl Mine the minerals include the oxidized (and lithium leached) heterosite, purpurite and sicklerite (intermediate solid solution mineral between unoxidized and oxidized end members). Ain’t learning fun?

I recently attended the Denver Gem and Mineral Guild spring show and picked up a nice specimen of purpurite collected from the Rainbow’s End Claim, Storm Mountain Pegmatite, Crystal Mountain District, Larimer County, Colorado: ~13 miles west of Fort Collins and Loveland.  The pegmatites seem related to the Silver Plume granites (Precambrian: ~1.4 Ga) and were intruded into schists of the Idaho Springs Formation (Precambrian: ~1.7 Ga   ) (Martin, 1993).  Jacobson (1986) was one of the last authors (I think) to report on the Crystal Mountain District and noted “blue apatite crystals, purpurite, spodumene, chrysoberyl and beryl are some of the choice mineral specimens available for collecting…This is one of the few pegmatite districts in Colorado where neither all the pegmatites have been found and studied or mapped nor all the minerals described.”  He listed 41 minerals of record.  Thirty years later MinDat.org has listed 55 valid minerals from ~ 60 claims, mines, prospects.  Most of the mining activity in the District, starting in 1884, centered around production of “mica” and beryl although most mines were rather unsuccessful (Thurston, 1952).  Jacobson (1986) stated that the pegmatites are beryl-rich and the rare lithium-rich minerals are in the most distal part away from the “parental granite.”
Purpurite (P) and alluaudite (A) on a "mica" schist (M) collected from the Rainbow's End Claim.  Width of specimen ~10.5 cm.
Purpurite is the most common phosphate mineral in the District and occurs in several of the prospects, mines, etc. (Eckel and others, 1997).    In addition, the purpurite specimens are a bright purple-lavender mass and are quite spectacular. Many/most purpurite specimens from the District are accompanied by the uncommon, tan phosphate, alluaudite 
[(Na,Ca)(Mn,Mg,Fe++)(Fe+++,Mn++)2(PO4)3].  Chemical analysis (EDS) by Modreski (Eckel, 1997) noted that some mines, prospects, etc. in the District produce purpurite while others offer heterosite.  At any rate, the Crystal Mountain District seems the only locality in Colorado that contains the phosphates purpurite/heterosite and alluaudite.

REFERENCES CITED

Eckel, E.B. and others, 1997, Minerals of Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, Colorado. 

Jacobson, M.I., 1996, Pegmatites of the Crystal Mountain District, Larimer County, Colorado: in Modreski, P.J., ed., Colorado pegmatites---Abstracts, Short Papers, and Field Guides of the Colorado Pegmatite Symposium, May 30-June 2, 1986: Denver, Colorado Chapter, Friends of Mineralogy.

London, D., 2017, Reading pegmatites: part 3---what lithium minerals say:  Rocks and Minerals, vol. 92, issue 2.

Lufkin, J.L., J.A. Redden, A. Lisenbee and T. Loomis, 2009, Guidebook to the geology of the Black Hills, South Dakota: Golden Publishers, Golden, Colorado.

Martin, C. M., 1993, Reconnaissance investigations of selected columbium and tantalum occurrences in Colorado: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open File Report 17-93.

Thurston, W. R., 1952, Pegmatites of the Crystal Mountain District, Larimer County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Trace Elements Investigations 139.   

Thursday, February 23, 2017

VOLBORTHITE; BRIGHTLY COLORED VANADIUM MINERAL

Submillimeter yellow "scales" of volborthite partially covering matrix.  Width of specimen ~3.6 cm.
In previous postings I have often written about the vanadates, along with the phosphates and arsenates, where vanadium bonds with oxygen to form a radical, VO4, with a charge of minus 3: (VO4)- - -  .  This anion then combines with metals or semi metals to form minerals.  And at times, PO4 and AsO4 substitute for the VO4.  However, vanadium also occurs in minerals where it acts as a cation with a plus 5 (usually) charge, V+++++.  One such mineral in this group is volborthite, a hydrated copper vanadate hydroxide [Cu3V2O7(OH)2—2H2O].

I have a couple of specimens purchase several years ago before Ackley’s Minerals, a small shop here in Colorado Springs, closed as the proprietors “retired” to the farm north of town.  Volborthite is a rare mineral that usually is observed as small, yellow to yellow-green “scales” encrusting part of a rock’s matrix.  The luster ranges from vitreous to opaque but is usually classifies as pearly.  The “scales” often may be seen as individuals but many times they are stacked on one another, and without magnification, appear as massive encrustations. On some specimens, but not mine, the small plates of volborthite form clusters of rosettes. The hardness is ~3.5 (Mohs) and I was able to get a light to pale green streak.  Volborthite does not fluoresce under a UV light.
Photomicrograph of volborthite "scales."  Width of photo ~6 mm.


Above two photomicrographs show submillimeter "scales" of volborthite.  
Volborthite is usually found in the highly-oxidized zone where hydrothermal solutions (coming off hot bodies of intruded magma) have deposited other vanadium-bearing minerals.  In the Colorado Plateau Type deposits, a sandstone-hosted mineral deposit, vanadium minerals often occur with uranium minerals; therefore, rockhounds originally believed minerals like volborthite were radioactive (just the radioactivity coming off the uranium minerals).  But, vanadium is a critical component of some uranium minerals such as carnotite: K2(UO2)2(VO4)2--3H2O.

Karpenkoite [Co3V2O7(OH)2—2H2O] is the cobalt analogue of volborthite since cobalt substitutes for the copper.  Martyite is the zinc analogue when zinc replaces the copper [Zn3V2O7(OH)2—2H2O].  Engelhauptite has the water (H2O) molecules replaced by potassium and chlorine molecules [KCu3(V2O7)(OH)2Cl].

My two specimens came from the Copper Hill Mine, Picuris District, Taos County, New Mexico, and according to the rock shop proprietors, were collected decades ago.  The Picuris District is part of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains and “is best known for the Harding pegmatite, a Proterozoic [late Precambrian] complex-zoned pegmatite, which has produced substantial amounts of beryl, lepidolite, spodumene, and tantalum-niobium (microlite) minerals” (McLemore and Mullen, 2004).  However, the Copper Hill Mine is a “strata-bound” copper-silver-antimony deposit” (Williams and Bauer, 1995) that produced the volborthite specimens.

I have been unable to locate much information about volborthite from the Copper Hill Mine.  In fact, MinDat does not list a primary vanadium mineral from Copper Hill; therefore, I “do not know” (no surprise here) where the vanadium “came from”?
   
REFERENCES CITED

McLemore, V.T., and K.E. Mullen, 2004, Mineral Resources in Taos County, New Mexico in New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook. 55th Field Conference, Geology of the Taos Region.


Williams, M.L., and P.W. Bauer, 1995, The Copper Hill Cu-Ag-Sb Deposit, Picuris Range, New Mexico: retrograde mineralization in a brittle-duct trap: Economic Geology, v. 90.

Monday, February 6, 2017

POTTSITE; A YELOLW LEAD BISMUTH VANADATE

The vanadates are among my favorite group of minerals, and along with the phosphates and arsenates, are usually grouped and studied together.  In these three groups, arsenic (As) or phosphorous (P) or vanadium (V) combine with oxygen (O) to from the arsenate (AsO4), phosphate (PO4) and vanadate (VO4) radicals.  Each of these radicals, with a negative charge of 3-  then combines with a positive charged cation metal(s), and often with water (H2O) or hydroxide (OH), to form a wide variety of minerals.  Since the three radicals are approximately the same size they often substitute for one another in a solid solution series.  For example, pyromorphite [lead phosphate [Pb5(PO4)3Cl] is in solid solution with mimetite [lead arsenate Pb5(AsO4)3Cl]---the negatively charged radicals change.  The latter mineral is usually a pale yellow to yellow-brown color while pyromorphite is usually green to yellow-green in color; however, intermediate stages in the solid solution series are known (from work with XRD or EDS or other gizmos).  Each of these radical groups may also combine with a variety of metals (cations with a positive charge) that often form solid solution series with each other.  For example, erythrite [cobalt arsenate] is in a complete solid solution series with annabergite [nickel arsenate] as the cobalt cation substitutes for the nickel cation: Co3(AsO4)2-8(H20) to Ni3(AsO4)2-8(H20). Therefore, it is easy to understand the wide range, number and variety of arsenate, phosphate and vanadate minerals when so many combinations of cations and radicals are possible.

Many arsenate—phosphate—vanadate minerals are bright in color, have easily observable crystals and are widely available at mineral shows.  Therefore, I am a sucker, actually a buyer, whenever these minerals are located at shows (if the price is right)! 

The arsenates and the phosphates are well known minerals such as copper arsenates: olivenite and clinoclase and cornwallite; and copper, zinc arsenate: austinite; cobalt arsenate: erythrite; lead arsenate: mimetite; and nickel arsenate: annabergite.  The phosphates include such minerals as calcium phosphate: apatite group; lead phosphate: pyromorphite; lithium phosphate: triphylite and amblygonite; copper aluminum phosphate: turquoise; and the rare-earth phosphates: monazite and xenotime.
The vanadates are not nearly as well know, or as common, as the previous groups but do include carnotite, a uranium vanadate; mottramite and descloizite, copper-rich and zinc-rich vanadates forming a solid solution series; and the best known of the group, vanadinite, the red to orange lead mineral with beautiful and collectible hexagonal crystals.

At the 2016 Tucson Show I was rummaging through some minerals at Shannon and Sons toward closing time and came upon a specimen of pottsite.  Normally I would have known little about this strange mineral except I had been reading about minerals containing bismuth (Bi).  Pottsite is a quite rare hydrated (H2O) lead and bismuth vanadate [(Pb3Bi)Bi(VO4)4-H2O] found in the oxide zones of tungsten-bearing rocks.  MinDat noted that pottsite is the only natural lead-bismuth vanadate known.  The Pb/Bi ratio varies from0.86 to 1.48. At the rock and mineral shows that I frequent pottsite is not a common mineral for sale as the mineral has only been found in four localities (MinDat): Cordoba, Argentina; Bavaria, Germany; and Nevada, USA (Churchill and Lander counties).  It seems as most of the collected specimens come from the type locality, the Linka (AKA Garnetite) Mine, Spencer Hot Springs District in Lander County.  The major target at the Linka was tungsten with slight recovery of copper and molybdenum.  Sherlock and others (1996) defined the Spencer Hot Springs District as a “Tungsten Skarn” where scheelite-bearing [calcium tungstate], calc-silicate rocks are formed at boundaries of hot magma bodies (a granodiorite at Linka) and carbonate rocks.  The hot fluids dissolve some of the carbonate rocks (a process of metamorphism called metasomatism) and deposit a wide variety of minerals dependent upon the composition of the hydrothermal fluid.  Evidently at the Spencer Hots Springs District, tungsten was a major component of the fluids along with secondary? lead, vanadium and bismuth.  I remain uncertain as to the rareness of combining lead and bismuth.
 
Macro photograph  showing crust of yellow microscopic crystals of pottsite.  Width of specimen ~1.5 cm.
Pottsite occurs as a bright yellow, almost druse, of microscopic (usually submillimeter) prismatic crystals (Tetragonal), or as stubby prisms or bipyramids.  They appear to be translucent to transparent and are soft at ~3.5 (Mohs). 



All of the above are photomicrographs showing submilimeter prismatic to stubby crystals of yellow pottsite. I am simply uncertain about the globular orange minerals. the chalky white mineral may be bismutite that lost the copper component?  These were also the best enlargements that I could produce with my equipment. 
The mineralization process concluding with the formation of pottsite is a complex sequence of events.  Williams (1988), in describing this new mineral, pointed out:  Pottsite is a product of oxidation that followed these events [late metamorphism]. Junoite [copper lead bismuth sulfide] was first replaced by waxy green Bismutite [bismuth carbonate] streaked with grey cerussite [lead carbonate]; the green bismutite then lost copper and became chalky white. Typically the bismutite was then converted to a powdery orange (unknown) bismuth vanadate which, in turn was replaced by clinobisvanite [bismuth vanadate]. Sparkling crusts of this mineral are commonplace in fractures anywhere close to oxidized junoite. In a few spots pottsite has replaced the unknown bismuth vanadate instead of clinobisvanite. It does not occur in association with clinobisvanite.
I originally thought that perhaps some orange material in the small sample was clinobisvanite (BiVO4).  However, I could not locate any fluorescence in the specimen---any indicator of clinobisvanite.  I also remain somewhat confused (not all that difficult) with the statement by Williams (1988): It [pottsite] does not occur in association with clinobisvanite.  My confusion relates to photos on MinDat showing specimens with both minerals present.  Perhaps new studies since 1988 have shown both minerals may be found together?  One of life’s persistent questions!

Speaking of those questions:  Life’s most persistent and urgent question is “What are you doing for others?”
                             Martin Luther King, Jr.

REFERENCE CITED

Sherlock, M.G., D.P. Cox, and D.F. Huber, 1996, Known mineral deposits and occurrences in Nevada: in Chapter 10 from Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 96-2: An analysis of Nevada's metal-bearing mineral resources): www.Nnsa.energy.gov/sites/dsfault/files/nnsa/imlinefiles


Williams, S.A., 1988, Pottsite, a new vanadate from Lander County, Nevada: Mineralogical Magazine, v. 52.

Friday, February 3, 2017

S. F. EMMONS, EMMONSITE, MT. EMMONS & TELLURIUM

In wandering through my collection of minerals brought home from the 2016 Tucson Show, I came across a specimen of emmonsite.  I reached to the back recesses of my mind trying to remember why I purchased such a specimen.  Yes, it is a nice green-yellow color and looked interesting under the loupe but then I remembered—I was going to check and see if emmonsite was named for the famous geologist Samuel Franklin Emmons.  Well, I finally got around to checking and sure enough emmonsite [Fe2(TeO3)3-2H2O], a fairly rare iron (ferric) tellurite, was named for a well-known geologist that Colorado has sort of claimed as a native son (although he was born in Boston in 1841 and descended from a long line of native Bostonians—lineages arrived in the 1630s), or at least a favorite son.
S.F. Emmons, ca. 1860s.  Photo courtesy of Library of Congress.
The following information is abstracted and interpreted from Hague (1912) who wrote a “Biographical Memoir” of Emmons published by the National Academy of Sciences.  Emmons was one of those “old fashioned” geologists, attending private primary and secondary schools in Boston and finishing up at the Dixwell Latin School.  Emmons was educated to become a gentleman of broad culture, refined manners, and to enter Harvard University, which he did at age 17, and graduated in 1861.  When I first read “1861” I wondered why he did not enlist in the U.S Army since Harvard furnished a number of students to the anti-slavery movement.  Hague (1912) noted that Emmons’ father persuaded him to pursue a professional career, rather than to follow many classmates into military service.  To further discourage enlistment (I presume), Emmons was sent by his father, after graduation, to Europe in order to accompany his mother on a health recuperation trip.  He seemed to have spent the summer of 1861 climbing mountains and hiking, and presumably taking care of his mother.  She sailed back to the States in November while Emmons toured London and ended the year in Paris.  In the City of Eternal Light, Emmons spent nine months working under private tutors in order to relearn French and prepare for entrance exams to the prestigious Ecole Imperiale des  Mines  (School of Mines).  Emmons spent two years at the School of Mines and then decided he wanted to get a more practical mining experience (hands-on) so spent the next year (1865) at the Bergakademie (Mountain Academy) at Freiberg, Saxony, Germany (where there were mines at the city limits).   After leaving Freiberg, Emmons spent the winter in Italy and finally returned to Boston in June 1866 (probably to the delight of his family since the conflict was over).
As a graduate student at the University of Utah, I fell “in love” with reading about the geological exploration of the American West via the Great Surveys:  F.V. Hayden and the United States Geological Survey of the Territories; Clarence King and the Geological Exploration of the Fortieth Parallel; John Wesley Powell and The Exploration of the Colorado River and its Canyons; George M. Wheeler and the many volumes of Explorations and Surveys West of the 100th Meridian.  These surveys of the western United States ultimately were reorganized (1879) into the United States Geological Survey.
A "Great Surveys" volume picked up at a garage sale 50 years ago.
This was an exciting time to be at the University since the senior instructors were only a couple or three generations removed from the early western geologists and had traversed the wide-open spaces of the west when it was still “wild.”  They had been trained as classical geologists (mostly in the eastern U.S.)  and tried to impart their thoughts to the students, especially the need for precise field work.  Our field trips often were taken to areas touched by Great Surveys.  I sort of fell into a trance standing at the entrance to Ladore Canyon on the Green River trying to imagine what John Wesley Powell felt as he guided his small boats into the “great unknown.”  Students were greatly impressed with the detective work of Clarence King (including Emmons) and his geologists in debunking the great diamond find in northwestern Colorado and we wondered if a ruby or diamond still were to be found?  Alas, no luck.
But back to Emmons (following Hague, 1912).  Upon returning to the States Emmons secured a job, at first as an unpaid volunteer, with the King Survey and they sailed for California in May 1867. He later was hired as an assistant geologist and Hague (1912) noted that Emmons “was full of youthful spirits and manly exhilaration over the work before us.”   Emmons worked for 10 years with various aspects of the King Survey that perhaps culminated with the publication (890 pages) of descriptive geology.  I did not realize (no surprise here) that after leaving the Survey Emmons “engaged actively in cattle ranching, and for some time made his home in Cheyenne, Wyoming.”
In 1879, the U.S. Congress created the Bureau of the Geological Survey (the USGS) and Clarence King was appointed the first director on April 3.  On August 4 of that year King appointed Emmons as “Geologist in Charge of the Rocky Mountain Division” and a mandate to devote his first years to “a study of the mineral wealth of the Rocky Mountains.”  In 1886, Emmons was the lead author of USGS Monograph XII, Geology and Mining Industry of Leadville, Colorado with Atlas (~779 pages).  Hague (1912) noted that it “won for its author an international reputation…probably no single publication of the geological survey has exerted a more beneficial influence and stimulated more discussion.”  Professional geologists could ask for little more than an accolade like that.
After Leadville Emmons lead an active geological life with an amazing number of papers on a wide variety of subjects, including: On glaciers in the Rocky Mountains; Notes on gold deposits in Montgomery, County, Maryland; Geology of the Tintic Special District, Utah.  In Colorado Emmons is remembered for excellent papers on Colorado ore deposits, Geology of Aspen Mining District, Geology of the Elk Mountains, Geology of Rosita and Silver Cliff and Mines of Custer County, Geology of the Denver Basin, and Geology of the Ten Mile District.  I would encourage interested readers to observe his bibliography (Hague, 1912) found at: https://books.google.com/books?id=vZ0aAAAAYAAJ&as_brr=4&pg=PA309#v=onepage&q&f=true.  In addition to his publications, Emmons was one of the founding members of the Geological Society of America and served as the President in 1903.
Also of interest to Colorado scientists: (in the history of the Colorado Scientific Society, the oldest scientific society in the Rocky Mountain region at www.coloscisoc.org.   On the evening of December 8th, 1882, a number of gentlemen interested in the formation of a scientific association met in the rooms of the United States Geological Survey, in Denver, at the invitation of Mr. Samuel Franklin Emmons.” “Mr. Emmons, in stating the object of the meeting, said that it seemed to him that the time had come for those persons in Colorado who were interested in true science to unite in forming an association or society, whose immediate object would be to facilitate the interchange of scientific observations and ideas, and promote intercourse among the observers themselves. There should be some means of recording and publishing the many interesting and valuable facts which are daily observed in different parts of the State. This could be done through the medium of a society, and the opportunity thus afforded would no doubt act as a stimulus to some to pursue investigations in directions specially open to them.” “An informal discussion ensued in which the advisability of such a step was advocated, and it was agreed to proceed at once to form a permanent organization.” “The following named persons were unanimously chosen as officers for the first year: President—Samuel Franklin Emmons Vice-President—Richard Pearce Secretary—Whitman Cross.”
Although Emmons was not a “Native Coloradoan” his work certainly qualified him as perhaps the most respected geologist in in the state’s history.  Emmons was active until his death in 1911.  Hague (1912) noted that “he left a noble record of life’s work well performed.”
Among other honors bestowed on Emmons, Colorado designated a 12,401-foot peak near Crested Butte in the West Elk Mountains as Mt. Emmons.  Not to be outdone, Utah designated a 13,448-foot peak in the High Uintas Wilderness as Mt. Emmons.  Interestingly, the Utah peak is connected by a rugged ridge to the highest peak in Utah, Kings Peak at 13,534 feet.  So, even in death Emmons and his long-time friend and colleage, Clarence King, remain connected.
Mt. Emmons, Colorado, 12,401 feet.  Photo courtesy Google Earth.
Mt. Emmons, Utah, 13,448 feet.  Photo courtesy Google Earth.
This offering started out about the mineral emmonsite and so it will finish with the same.  Emmonsite is one of a few minerals that contain the element tellurium, a silver-white metalloid (possesses properties of both metals and non-metals). Tellurium is an extremely rare element as most rocks contain about 3 parts per billion and is 8 times less abundant than gold (Goldfarb, 2014), and is related to selenium but may be only mildly toxic!  Tellurium is rarely found in a native form.
Tellurium can act as a cation with a 4+ oxidation state as in the uncommon mineral tellurite, TeO2, or with a 6+ oxidation state as in jensenite, Cu3TeO6-2H2O   The telluride anion with a charge of 2- can combine with gold and silver cations in the minerals calaverite (AuTe2) and sylvanite (AuAgTe4).  These telluride minerals form major gold ores at Cripple Creek, Colorado.  So, it is confusing when one talks about tellurium, tellurite, and telluride.
Emmonsite [Fe2+++(Te++++O3)3-2H2O; a hydrated iron tellurite, occurs in a wide variety of habits from microscopic druses, to hair-like masses, sprays, compact masses, globs, and small acicular crystals.  I could not locate information on larger than microscopic crystals but MinDat lists emmonsite as belonging to the Triclinic System. It has a green to yellow-green color, vitreous to subvitreous to even dull luster, opaque to translucent to transparent diaphaneity, and is reasonably hard at ~5.0 (Mohs).  Its characteristic yellow-green color combined with the often branching (coral-like) or fungus-like shape are the best identifying marks.  Emmonsite is a secondary mineral found in the oxide zones of hydrothermal tellurium-bearing base minerals.  It is often found with native tellurium and the telluride minerals.
Green, fungal-like habit of emmonsite.  Length main "mass" of mineral ~4 mm.
Hillebrand (1885) gave the type locality of emmonsite as Tombstone, Arizona. As described by Pearl (1941), the discovery of a new mineral which he named emmonsite in honor of Samuel B. Emmons, first president of the Colorado Scientific Society and one of America's outstanding geologists, was told by W. F. Hillebrand at the meeting of the society at the Arapahoe County (now Denver) Court House on June 1, 1885. The mineral had been sent by R. C. Hills from an uncertain locality near Tombstone, Arizona Territory. So, it would seem that Emmons was (may have been) at the Colorado Scientific Society meeting when Hillebrand gave his description of emmonsite.
Hillebrand (1904) also described emmonsite(?) from Colorado and in Bulletin 262 of the USGS (1905) stated a green mineral was collected at the W.P.H. Mine at Cripple Creek that showed a close resemblance to emmonsite he described 20 years ago (the specimen from Tombstone).  However, Williams (1980) believed that the mineral described from Tombstone actually was rodalquilarite, a hydrogen iron tellurite chloride.  Eckel and others (1997) then believed it would then make sense to declare the mines at Cripple Creek, Colorado, as the type locality for emmonsite.  However, I note that MinDat still lists Tombstone as the type locality.
My specimen of emmonsite was collected from the Bambolla Mine (Montezuma Mine) located in Municipio de Moctezuma, Sonora, Mexico.  I have been unable to locate much information on the Mine other than in the 1970s, it was a producing gold mine.  I assume, that like nearby mines, mineralization was related to hydrothermal activity associated with Tertiary volcanic action.  However, the amazing information is that the Mine, and the nearby (half mile away) Bambollita Mine, are the type localities of at least 23 tellurium-bearing minerals!  Also, I stumbled upon an article, actually a discussion, of a micro-mineral group (Associazione Micro-mineralogica Italiana).  Luckily, the discussion was in English!  At any rate, Ciriotti (2010) noted: Oxide-zone tellurium minerals are relatively rare worldwide… 71 known Te-oxide minerals, 68 of which are considered valid species; most are either tellurite (Te4+O3)2- or tellurate (Te6+O6)6- species… over 60% of the species (43 out of 71) were discovered at only four deposits: Moctezuma, Mexico; Tombstone, Arizona; Centennial Eureka Mine, Utah; and Otto Mountain, California. In fact, nearly a third of all Te-O mineral species were discovered in just one deposit: Moctezuma. Many of these species are still found at only one locality today… The four leading occurrences listed above are all oxidized base metal deposits, and not surprisingly, 60% of all Te-O minerals contain Pb and/or Cu. If Zn and Fe are added in, this increases to 84%... And that sort of sums up my limited knowledge about tellurium minerals.

This is one of those postings that started out as a simple discussion of the Colorado Scientific Society and its first president S. F. Emmons.  However, it morphed into the fascinating world of tellurium and the resulting minerals.  I am still trying to digest some of the information but needed to draw a conclusion line---somewhere!  Unfortunately, the length and breadth of the subject may turn off all but the most dedicated readers and for this I apologize.  But, just as a dog worries a bone I worry a subject that I don’t really understand.  The good thing is that “new learning” is a joy for me and hopefully keeps my brain alive. My philosophy about learning may be summed up by two rather famous individuals:

Anyone who stops learning is old, whether at twenty or eighty.  Anyone who keeps learning stays young.   Henry Ford

Every time I learn something new it pushes some old stuff out of my brain.    Homer Simpson

REFERENCES CITED
Ciriotti, M.E., 2010, Oxidation zone tellurium minerals: Associazione Micro-mineralogica Italiana.  http://forum.amiminerals.it/viewtopic.php?t=7168.
Eckel,E.B. (and others), 1997, Minerals of Colorado: Denver, Fulcrum Publishing.
Goldfarb, R., 2014, Tellurium—the bright future of solar energy: USGS Fact Sheet 2014-3077.
Hague, A., 1912, Biographical memoir of Samuel Franklin Emmons, 1841-1911: National Academy of Sciences, Biographical Memoirs, v. VII. 
Hillebrand, W.F., 1885, Emmonsite, a ferric tellurite: Colorado Scientific Society Proceedings, v. 2, pt. 1.
Hillebrand, W.F., 1904, Emmonsite(?) from a new locality: American Journal of Science, 4th Series, v. 18, no. 108.
Hillebrand, 1905, Two tellurium minerals from Colorado: U.S. geological Survey Bulletin 262. 
Pearl, R.M., 1941, Minerals named for Colorado men: Colorado Magazine, v. 18, no. 2.

Williams, S.A., 1980, The Tombstone district, Cochise County, Arizona: Mineralogical Record, v. 11, no. 4.